In hedge funds, your ambition (performance) is marked daily. Your IRR versus a benchmark, updated every morning. In real estate, it’s the deal or development you build. In venture? It’s much murkier.
I’ve been sitting with this since a late night conversation in SF last week. Four of us — a successful founder, a peer VC, my partner David, and me. Someone asked what ambition actually means in this business. Nobody had a clean answer.
Part of the problem is the power law. In theory, your whole career can hinge on one decision. One coffee meeting, one term sheet, and a whole lot of luck. That’s both clarifying and paralyzing. It means ambition might compress down to “did you find the one?” One could go an entire career without it, or find an Anthropic their first year.
So in the absence of a clean scorecard, people reach for proxies. Things that are measurable right now.
Fund size. AUM. Logos. Midas List. Twitter following. Office aesthetics. Team headcount. Unicorns claimed.
None of those are nothing. But none of them are ambition either. They’re what ambition looks like when the real thing won’t resolve for years.
My own answer, still imperfect: ambition in VC lives in the quality of the judgment. Backing someone nobody believes in, at the earliest possible moment, and being right. It lives in the relationships — the founders who call you first, not because of your brand, but because of you. And it lives in what the work is doing to you personally.
